Showing posts with label Fund Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fund Management. Show all posts

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Tock Research - As Hedge Fund Industry

Both the hedge fund and private equity industry had free rides during George Bush's Administration when the Congress was safely in Republican hands. All that changed in November 06 when the Democrats swept the Congress, and with the change in control came new Democratic responsibilities to address the fiscal deficits generated during the time, the Republicans controlled both the executive and legislative branches of government.

All About Hedge Funds : The Easy Way to Get Started
by Robert A. Jaeger

Explains how any investor can take advantage of the high-potential returns of hedge funds while incorporating safeguards to limit their volatility and risk. This clear-headed, commonsense guide tells investors:

  • What hedge funds are and what they are not
  • Four key hedge fund strategies
  • How to incorporate hedge funds into an existing portfolio
  • Types of risk involved in hedge fund investing

It is strange to ponder, but the Republican Party which is considered by most to be the party of fiscal responsibility has probably generated 80% to 90% of the nation's accumulated national debt. Nevertheless, myths still persist that the Democrats are the big spenders. Just today, the major newspapers featured articles stating that Bush says Democrats must control spending.

Now there are only two ways to deal with spending. The first is to spend less, but no politician likes that concept. The first rule of government is that politicians regardless of party spend money. The second way is to raise taxes in an attempt to close the gap between spending and revenues taken in. With the Democrats in power, they will use the second method, which now brings us to Hedge Funds and Private Equity.

Under the provisions of the current tax code, both Hedge Funds and Private Equity are given preferential tax treatment. Certain items of income which might be considered subject to ordinary income tax rates are instead subject to 15% capital gains tax rates. As for the equity of this policy, the quick and dirty of it, is that there is no equity or fairness. The tax code is 80,000 pages of special interests. Every provision in the tax code was written in a certain way to benefit some one, or some special interest, whether it's the farmer or a hedge fund, or the restaurant industry. Everybody exercised their political muscle at one time or another to get what they could out of the tax code.

These special interests just head down to Washington DC and meet with the people who control the Congress, go to fancy restaurants, and try to re-work the tax code to benefit themselves. The latest journeyman to Washington is none other than Henry Kravis, the man who made the private equity industry what it is today, through the formation of Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts and Company (KKR). Democratic Congressman Sander M. Levin is proposing to more than double the amount of taxes Kravis now pays. Kravis is a billionaire several times over, and he's still looking to cut his tax bill. Whatever happened to giving back. Whatever happened to Andrew Carnegie's approach to civic responsibility?

The Congressman's staff asked Henry Kravis very pointedly, if increasing taxes on private equity would adversely affect workers and other middle income type families by distinctly lowering returns that pension funds got on their investments. When Kravis answered "No", the meeting ended abruptly.

In other meetings, Stephen Schwartzman who founded the Blackstone Group, and David Rubenstein, who co-founded the Carlyle Group have met with other regulators in an attempt to stall the tide. Lobbying groups are being set up in a hurry, and money is being poured into them by private equity and hedge funds, who up until recently were asleep at the switch. They did not realize to what extent Washington has had them in their gun sights. For more on this topic, please visit our website.

Related Post:

More on this article...

Monday, August 20, 2007

Make your Choice on Mutual Fund

There are thousands of mutual funds to invest your money in. So how do you pick one over the other? Here are some things to look for when making your choice:

  • Fund Performance. The single most important measure to consider is how the funds have performed over time. Check the three- and five-year annual return (and ten-year if available) and see how well it’s done through the years. Anything that has returned at least 10% or more per year over a long period of time would certainly be worth considering.
  • Fund Management. The next thing to look at is how long the current management has been managing the fund. If a fund has returned 20% a year for the past five years, and the current manager is the one who managed it for those entire five years, you should certainly feel comfortable with that person’s skills. If the fund returned 20% for four years and 3% last year, and the current manager just took over last year, I’d be skeptical until he’s managed it a few more years.
  • Volatility. The most volatile funds (like aggressive-growth) will return more in the long run, but will also drop more on bad market days. If you can stomach volatility and are in it for the long-haul, go with a more volatile fund. If you are in it for the short-term or just can’t stand to see your fund go down even for a day, get into something more conservative.
  • Cost of getting into a fund. Every fund will have an expense ratio. This is the percentage of the fund’s money that is deducted each year for the fund manager’s salary, mailings, marketing, and other costs. As long as the ratio is in line with most other successful funds, I wouldn’t be concerned about it. If it’s extremely high compared to others, I would certainly expect a much higher return than other funds. Also, you need to be concerned with whether the fund is a “load” or “no-load” fund. In other words, do you have to pay (load) to get into the fund or is there no cost to get in (no-load)? There are many successful no-load funds to get into. I’d only get into a loaded fund if it has produced exceptional returns year after year.

All of the information I mentioned above on mutual funds can usually be found in a special mutual fund issue published at the beginning of each year by Kiplinger’s or Money Magazine. Using those sources, along with asking a financial professional should help you pick the fund that is right for you.

Related Post:

More on this article...